Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

RE: EOR (Hyatt)

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Title: RE: EOR (Hyatt)

The Texas A&M Engineering Ethics site has a pretty good summary of the story, and also includes an annotated bibliography.  Go to http://lowery.tamu.edu/ethics/ and scroll down to the section entitled "Ethics Case Studies".  There are 3 links about the case: the first is the summary and the other two contain photos.

As a side note, those of us in the Dallas area get to hear from Jack Gillum, the EOR, at our SEAoT meeting tomorrow night!

-- Joel

-------------------------
Joel Adair, EIT
Halff Associates, Inc.
E-mail: jadair(--nospam--at)halff.com
-------------------------


-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Adams [mailto:davea(--nospam--at)laneengineers.com]
Sent: Monday, January 22, 2001 4:40 PM
To: 'seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org'
Subject: RE: EOR (Hyatt)


I've got a brief blurb on this failure in a book entitled "Design &
Construction Failures" by Dov Kaminetzky, who explains that neither the
originally-designed connection detail of the hanger rods to the channels nor
the as-built detail could safely support imposed loads. Both details placed
these hanger rods at the edge of channel flanges without any stiffeners or
reinforcing plates.

I'd be interested in reading more about this failure. Does anyone have a
reference to recommend?


Regards,
Dave K. Adams, S.E.
Lane Engineers, Inc.
PH: (559) 688-5263
E-mail: davea(--nospam--at)laneengineers.com



-----Original Message-----
From: Todd Hill [mailto:thill(--nospam--at)tkarch.com]
Sent: Monday, January 22, 2001 12:43 PM
To: 'seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org'
Subject: RE: EOR


<<
The Kansas City Hyatt walkway failure, in the early 1980's, is one of most
prolific of the many examples where the Engineers were responsible for
failures that occurred from a design changes made without their knowledge.
>>

Actually the design change was with their knowledge, they choose not to
check it (even after an architect brought it to their attention). I didn't
read anything in the court case on omission of on-site inspections, but I
only have a brief copy of the court case (final version is 442 pages long).

******* ***
*   Read list FAQ at: http://www.seaint.org/list_FAQ.asp
*   This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers
*   Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To
*   subscribe (no fee) to the list, send email to
*   admin(--nospam--at)seaint.org and in the body of the message type
*   "join seaint" (no quotes). To Unsubscribe, send email
*   to admin(--nospam--at)seaint.org and in the body of the message
*   type "leave seaint" (no quotes). For questions, send
*   email to seaint-ad(--nospam--at)seaint.org. Remember, any email you
*   send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted
*   without your permission. Make sure you visit our web
*   site at: http://www.seaint.org ********

******* ***
*   Read list FAQ at: http://www.seaint.org/list_FAQ.asp
*   This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers
*   Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To
*   subscribe (no fee) to the list, send email to
*   admin(--nospam--at)seaint.org and in the body of the message type
*   "join seaint" (no quotes). To Unsubscribe, send email
*   to admin(--nospam--at)seaint.org and in the body of the message
*   type "leave seaint" (no quotes). For questions, send
*   email to seaint-ad(--nospam--at)seaint.org. Remember, any email you
*   send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted
*   without your permission. Make sure you visit our web
*   site at: http://www.seaint.org ********