Subject: Re: EOR(Kansas City Hyatt Walkway Failure)
Christopher Wright P.E wrote:
> << The sequence leaves off a pivotal event--the design change from
> independent support of both walkways to supporting one walkway from
> I see the "pivotal event" being when the EOR designed the hanger rods to
> excessive length not readily available on the market, this being some 64
> feet as I recall. I would call this, "impossibility of design"
> when it came to field erection.>>>>
Yes, full length rods were not readily available.
Yes, the original design had constructability issues
but it WAS serviceable & safe.....average (or below average) engineering.
I guess we could debate the "real" cause(s) of this disaster for a long
Who is more culpable...the guy who sets up the situation for a design change
request, the guy who requests the change or the guy who makes the change in
haste w/o adequate review?
I would have to agree with Chris Wright.....<a pivotal event--the design
independent support of both walkways to supporting one walkway from another>
Prior to the design change everyone was still alive....inconvenience is
minor compared to death....that's a REAL problem.
Too bad the original designer was not an avid reader of the McMaster-Carr
industrial supply catalog.... a box full of coupling nuts would have made
everyone happy :)
Bob Kazanjy, PE