Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

RE: Transitions at welded splices

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

I'm not sure if you misunderstood my question or if I misunderstand your

The real point of my question is whether a transition is required for:
1. Beam to column web moment connections (LRFD Vol.2 Fig. 10-25(a), pg
10-61).  The flange plates at the column are generally intentionally made
thicker than the beam flanges to account for flange tilt and over/under run
of depth.  Is a transition required in this case?  It seems as if note 3 at
the bottom of page 10-65 addresses this.
2. Beam to girder moment connection (LRFD Vol.2 Fig. 10-28(a), pg 10-66).
Where a beam is welded "through" a girder (generally for a cantilever
condition), the girder size is usually heavier than the beam size (and the
girder flange thicker than the beam flange).  Is a transition required in
this case?

Are the above items in some different classification from a beam splice?  If
so why?  I agree that the wording is quite clear for the case of a welded
beam moment splice in that a transition is required when the stress exceeds
1/3 of the allowable.

Thanks for your opinions,
William Pulyer
Charlotte, NC

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Charlie Carter [SMTP:carter(--nospam--at)]
> Sent:	Tuesday, February 06, 2001 11:12 PM
> To:	'seaint(--nospam--at)'
> Subject:	RE: Transitions at welded splices
> I think the written words (last paragraph on LRFD Vol II page 10-58, which
> continues on to page 10-59) that go along with that Figure spell out the
> requirements for splice transitions in wind and low-seismic applications
> (R <= 3). For high -seismic applications (R > 3), there are specific
> requirements regarding transitions in the AISC Seismic Provisions.
> Also, some of the items you listed below are for transitions withing
> connection elements, not flange or similar splices. That is not the same
> case as a splice somewhere out in the length of a girder. Did I
> misunderstand what you were asking?
> Charlie 
> -----Original Message----- 
> From:   BILL PULYER [SMTP:WPULYER(--nospam--at)] 
> Sent:   Tuesday, February 06, 2001 7:20 AM 
> To:     'SEAINT List' 
> Subject:        Transitions at welded splices 
> When designing or inspecting welded moment joints, is a tapered transition
> always required where the member thicknesses are different? 
> There seems to be some conflicting, or at least ambiguous, information in 
> AWS and AISC regarding this subject. 
> *AWS D1.1 Section 2.20 requires a transition for all tension butt joints 
> where the stress is greater than 1/3 of the allowable. 
> *AISC LRFD Vol.2 (pg 10-60, Fig 10-23) shows a beam moment splice.  This 
> splice includes a transition and seems to agree with the AWS wording. 
> *AISC LRFD Vol.2 (pgs 10-60 to 10-64) describes beam to column web moment 
> connections.  Note  3 at the bottom of page 10-65 states that transitions 
> need not be provided (for connections not detailed for seismic 
> considerations). 
> *AISC LRFD Vol.2 (pgs 10-65 to 10-66) describes a beam to girder moment 
> connection.  This sections does not specifically address the issue of 
> transition. 
> Please let me hear some opinions regarding your interpretations.  Should 
> transitions always be provided for welded splices?  If not, what are some
> of 
> the criteria to determine what is acceptable and what is not? 
> Thanks, 
> William Pulyer PE 
> Charlotte, NC