To: "INTERNET:seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org" <seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org>
Subject: RE: K FACTORS
From: Peter Higgins <76573.2107(--nospam--at)compuserve.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 14:46:29 -0500
The jury is no longer out on who's "winning". The score on "advanced"
design is: US & Japan
still with K factors, the rest of the world uses the "advanced" design.
We (AISC) really should enter the 20th century before the 21st gets too far
Peter Higgins, SE
Message text written by INTERNET:seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org
>Good point, Peter. However, there are two camps in the stability arena:
those that think advanced analysis techniques can be used with K = 1 in all
cases and those that don't. I can't tell which set of great minds is
"winning" at this point, but the discussions are very interesting and