From: richard lewis <rlewistx(--nospam--at)juno.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 12:11:09 -0600
I was in Charlotte in January to discuss the project with the city
building officials. They told me NC planned to adopted the IBC on
On Wed, 28 Feb 2001 12:03:29 -0500 "Michael Zaitz" <mzaitz(--nospam--at)hgbd.com>
> Just a question regarding NC codes. Is NC going to adopt the IBC in
> any way
> shape or form?
> "Effland, Greg" wrote:
> > The ASCE7-93 and ASCE7-88 wind loads are the same. The big
> difference, as
> > you mentioned, is between 7-93 and 7-95 when the winds changed
> from fastest
> > mile winds to 3 second gusts.
> > You are also correct in that the current NC code (1996) refers to
> > for wind loads...
> > Greg Effland, P.E.
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: richard lewis [mailto:rlewistx(--nospam--at)juno.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 2:15 PM
> > To: seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org
> > Subject: ASCE 7-93 Wind Design
> > I am designing a building in North Carolina. The current NC code
> > requires the wind loads be calculated using ASCE 7-93. I have a
> 7-88 and
> > a 7-95, but not a 7-93. I know there was a drastic change between
> > and 7-95 for wind loads. Can somebody who has the 7-88 and 7-93
> code let
> > me know if there is a major difference in calculating the wind
> > between these codes?
> > Thanks for your help.
> > Rich Lewis
> > ________________________________________________________________
> > GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
> > Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
> > Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit:
> > http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.
GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit: