To: "'seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org'" <seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org>
Subject: RE: 6.2+ earthquake in Seattle
From: Charlie Griffes <charlie(--nospam--at)ctengineering.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2001 12:20:13 -0800
Seattle does not require retrofit of any buildings unless the owner is
making other changes or improvements to the building. There are various
triggers in the Seattle amendments to the UBC that will require the building
to meet the current code requirements. My opinion is that this is an
awkward provision since it is very difficult to show that the retrofit has
actually brought the old building into full compliance with current codes.
There seems to always be a compromise of some sort that is reached with the
building official with respect to the scope of the upgrades required.
Outside of Seattle, I am not aware of any requirements other than the UBC
provisions reagarding unsafe conditions.
This latest event may precipitate some changes.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: barry2 [SMTP:wellive(--nospam--at)attglobal.net]
> Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2001 6:59 AM
> To: seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org
> Subject: Re: 6.2+ earthquake in Seattle
> Also the surrounding areas. Olympia, Tacoma etc. Is there any uniform
> retrofit guidelines in use??
> Barry H. Welliver
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Yousefi, Ben" <Ben.Yousefi(--nospam--at)ci.sj.ca.us>
> To: <seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2001 3:07 PM
> Subject: RE: 6.2+ earthquake in Seattle
> > Charlie
> > Does Seattle have an ordinance for the retrofit of URM buildings?
> > Thanks
> > Ben
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Charlie Griffes [SMTP:charlie(--nospam--at)ctengineering.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2001 1:32 PM
> > To: 'seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org'
> > Subject: RE: 6.2+ earthquake in Seattle
> > Well, we seem to have survived well enough at CT Engineering in
> > Seattle.
> > Our 3 story wood frame building rolled around for awhile, our
> > drawing file
> > drawers fell over, but the bookcases stayed put ( I did have my hand
> > on my
> > bookcase as it was showing signs of falling over). No gypboard wall
> > cracks,
> > no ceiling tiles fell in our office, but some fell in adjacent
> > office.
> > Employees were reasonably aroused, but have settled down now. Most
> > are off
> > to check their homes for damage.
> > The older buildings in Pioneer Square apparently suffered damage
> > with
> > masonry walls failing. We have one engineer off to an architects
> > office to
> > examine some beams which were displaced and 1/4" cracks in the
> > unreinforced
> > masonry infill walls. I have heard of some road closures, one of
> > which is
> > due to some grating that fell out.
> > Charlie Griffes
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Samir Ghosn [SMTP:sghosn(--nospam--at)harris-assoc.com]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2001 12:14 PM
> > > To: seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org
> > > Subject: Re: 6.2+ earthquake in Seattle
> > >
> > > News
> > > It has been reported on CNN that the magnitude is 7.0 The CNN
> > clip shows
> > > people in panic. Is there any body in Seatlle that can give more
> > info on
> > > what is the extent of Damage being reported localy??
> > > Samir Ghosn, P.E.
> > > Harris & Associates
> > > At 11:34 AM 2/28/2001 -0800, you wrote:
> > > > News being shown in So. Cal. shows alot of used brick in the
> > streets
> > > >from the unreinforced brick buildings.
> > > >Williston "Bill" L. Warren, IV - S.E.
> > > >Structural Engineering SOLutions
> > > >Newport Beach, California
> > >
> > >
> ****** ****** ********