Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

RE: Blown Away

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
I have heard this behavior defined as bottom feeding.

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	L. Thomas Bayne [SMTP:tom(--nospam--at)soilsengineering.com]
> Sent:	Wednesday, March 07, 2001 2:04 PM
> To:	seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org
> Subject:	Re: Blown Away
> 
> There seems to be a "symbiotic" relationship between bad clients and
> upstart
> companies who get the left-overs from their more established counterparts.
> The upstarts get their fingers burnt and learn.  The bad clients still
> somehow get the work done cheaper.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <Stanley_P_Johnson(--nospam--at)dot.ca.gov>
> To: <seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2001 12:27 PM
> Subject: Blown Away
> 
> 
> > I think he figured that if he cut loose of the right clients he would
> >
> > Cut his hours from 80 per week to 60 per week.
> >
> > Cut his liability by 25%.
> >
> > Cut his liability insurance premiums by 20%
> >
> > Cut his gross income by 5% to 10%.
> >
> > Stan Johnson
> >
> >
> > > What a firm !!!!!!!!! How did you do it?
> > > Allan Yango
> >
> > > HAWNENG(--nospam--at)aol.com wrote:
> >
> > > > Do you really want this architect as one of your clients?  Some of
> the
> > > > best
> > > > business decisions we have made over the years is to fire several of
> > > > our
> > > > clients.
> > > >
> > > > G. Showerman
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
>