To: "IBC list (E-mail)" <IBC_IRC(--nospam--at)listbot.com>, "Se-Practice List (E-mail)" <se-practice(--nospam--at)polhemus.cc>, "Seaint list (E-mail)" <seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org>
Subject: Shear wall horizontal steel engaging end verticals when Vu>Acv*sq rt(f'c). 1997 UBC 19188.8.131.52 vs. IBC - ACI318/R99 Sect. 184.108.40.206
From: "Haan, Scott M." <HaanSM(--nospam--at)ci.anchorage.ak.us>
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 12:48:56 -0900
1997 UBC 19220.127.116.11 required horizontal concrete shearwall steel to engage
end vertical steel when Vu>Acv*sqrt(f'c). The 2000 IBC adopts ACI 318-99.
ACI 318-99 does not clearly spell out that horizontal steel needs to engage
end verticals when Vu>Acv*sqrt(f'c). The IBC does not amend ACI 318-99 on
ACI 318-99 section 18.104.22.168 indicates only reinforcement that is required
for shear strength needs to be continuous. Shear reinforcement is not
required for strength until Vu>phi*Acv*2*sqrt(f'c). ACI 318-99 section
22.214.171.124 indicates that continuous reinforcement needs to be spliced and
anchored per ACI 21.5.4. This means horizontal reinforcement is not required
to be continuous when Acv*sqrt(f'c)<Vu<phi*2*Acv*sqrt(f'c). ? I see
Acv*sqrt(f'c)<Vu<phi*2*Acv*sqrt(f'c) all the time in low buildings.
ACI 21.5.4 does not mention engaging end bars. Even if the shear
reinforcement is needed for strength [Vu>phi*Acv*sqrt(f'c)] and is required
to be continuous it could be turned down or up and not have to engage end
verticals the way ACI 318-99 appears to be written.
What is the reason that the UBC requirement appears to be lessened in ACI
318-99? Is it to eliminate horizontals engaging end bars for tilt-up?
This question is pertinent to our local IBC code adoption. Thanks for the
one private response the last time I asked this.
Scott M Haan P.E.
Plan Review Engineer
Building Safety Division http://muni.org/building,
Development Services Department,
Municipality of Anchorage
phone: 907-343-8183 fax: 907-249-7399