Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

Re: 2001 CA SE Exam

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
If SEAOC will add by 2004 part III to NCEES I & II, what would be the
position of the new talk about ASE (Acadmy of SE) and double tier SE-I &

Wael Shabana, P.E.

----- Original Message -----
From: Gerard Madden <GMadden(--nospam--at)>
To: <seaint(--nospam--at)>
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2001 11:51 PM
Subject: 2001 CA SE Exam

I was looking at the CA PE Board's website at lunch and came across a
bulletin regarding the 2001 SE exam.

As many of you know, (From SEAOC Newsletters & Post to the list from Ron
Hamburger) the format is supposed to change to the NCEES I, II, and a 3rd
part on Seismic Design by 2004. The bulletin states that in response to
this, they have changed the format somewhat from what the Western States SE
exam used to be. It might be useful to those planning to take the test to
review. I'm not sure how major these changes are.

One thing I found troubling was that certain questions will force you to use
either ASD or LRFD, not choose the one you want to use. Which requires you
to learn both.

>From what I understand, the state of Washington has already switched to
NCEES with a 3rd part for seismic. Can anyone confirm or deny this and
possibly tell us anything useful? I can't take the test until 2002, but I'm
beginning to scope out study aides and the like in preparation.


Gerard Madden, P.E.
Civil Engineer

Middlebrook + Louie, Structural Engineers
71 Stevenson Street, Suite 2100
San Francisco, CA 94105
Tel: 415.546.4900
Fax: 415.974.3680
Email: gmadden(--nospam--at)


Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free address at