Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

Re: Roof Equipment

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
On average, the 1997 UBC F-sub-p equation has been calibrated to be 1.4
times bigger than that from the 1994 UBC, the difference between the
allowable stress EQ and the strength EQ.  Your C-sub-a value of 0.57
indicates that you must be seeing the effects of the near-source factor
N-sub-a.  In that case, you should be seeing the same increase in your
structure loads.  Your increase from the old codes is due to the seismic
coefficient C-sub-a, not Equation 32-2.

Rick Drake, SE
Fluor Daniel, Aliso Viejo, CA

***********************************



                                                                                                                   
                    "Larry Hauer"                                                                                  
                    <lrhauer@earthl      To:     "seaint" <seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org>                                      
                    ink.net>                                                                                       
                    04/03/01 12:45       cc:                                                                       
                    PM                                                                                             
                    Please respond       Subject:     Roof Equipment                                               
                    to seaint                                                                                      
                                                                                                                 . 
                                                                                                                   





What is the common practice for anchoring roof top  mounted equipment based
on the '97 UBC? Per Table 16-O, 3),C), an Ap of 2.5 and  Rp of 3.0 is
required. Using Formula 32-2 with Ca=0.57, I'm coming up with  1.36W,
(ASD). Has it really increased this much over the older  codes?

Thanks in advance,

Larry Hauer, S.E.





-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The information transmitted is intended only for the person
or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential
and/or privileged material. If you are not the intended recipient 
of this message you are hereby notified that any use, review,
retransmission, dissemination, distribution, reproduction or any
action taken in reliance upon this message is prohibited. If you 
received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the 
material from any computer.  Any views expressed in this message
are those of the individual sender and may not necessarily reflect 
the views of the company.  
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------