From: John Rose <jrose36(--nospam--at)earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2001 12:09:47 -0800
I believe this was an oversight in the IBC. It probably will be corrected
in a future IBC revision (probably to be handled by AF&PA) through the code
John Rose/APA (retired)
David B Merrick wrote:
> I tried to follow the IBC2000 reference to their 16d nail. 2303.6 calls
> out ASTM F 1667, but no where can I find the size of a 16d nail.
> I know the answer in the UBC, but where is the answer in the IBC?
> David Merrick