Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

Re: IBC2000 size of a 16d nail

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
David,
I believe this was an oversight in the IBC. It probably will be corrected
in a future IBC revision (probably to be handled by AF&PA) through the code
review process.
John Rose/APA (retired)

David B Merrick wrote:

> I tried to follow the IBC2000 reference to their 16d nail. 2303.6 calls
> out ASTM F 1667, but no where can I find the size of a 16d nail.
>
> I know the answer in the UBC, but where is the answer in the IBC?
>
> David Merrick
>