Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

Re: ductility requirements for rebars

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
For ductile design ACI requires ASTM A706 rebar or an equivalent where the
elongation is 10-14%. A615 is typically 7-9% elongation.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Prakash C. Chowdhury" <pcchowdhury(--nospam--at)yahoo.com>
To: <seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org>
Cc: <SpragueHO(--nospam--at)bv.com>
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 6:57 AM
Subject: ductility requirements for rebars


> This query may be too basic for members but I am not a civil engineer and
> am more concerned here with requirements for material specifications.
>
> Steel rebar specs around the world specify widely varying requirements
> for rebar 'elongation %'. One reason is that the steels vary from the
> high-carbon steels in some ASTM specs to more ductile low-alloy steels.
> As for service requirements, the steel may not be normally required to
> sustain a strain more than the 3 to 4% that the concrete can take. But
> what is the situation when designing for earthquake resistance ? Is it
> sufficient to rely on detailing for ductile design or is there a minimum
> elongation % mandated for the steel rebar ?
>
> When the CEB Model Code was being formulated in Europe in the 80's, there
> was a proposal to test the steel so that it undergoes 3 strain reversals
> (in the plastic region) but it may have been dropped because of the
> difficulty of regular testing for such low-cycle fatigue.
>
> I will welcome any responses off-list if they are considered of marginal
> interest to list members. Thanks in advance.
>
>
> =====
> Prakash C.Chowdhury, B.Sc(Surrey), Ph.D.(N'cle),
> Regional Resident Representative, Torsteel Research Foundation in
India,H-1A, Hauz Khas,New Delhi - 110 016, INDIA.
> E-Mail : pcchowdhury(--nospam--at)yahoo.com
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices
> http://auctions.yahoo.com/
>
> *
> *   This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers
> *   Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To
> *   subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to:
> *
> *   http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp
> *
> *   Questions to seaint-ad(--nospam--at)seaint.org. Remember, any email you
> *   send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted
> *   without your permission. Make sure you visit our web
> *   site at: http://www.seaint.org
>



* 
*   This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers 
*   Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To 
*   subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to:
*
*   http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp
*
*   Questions to seaint-ad(--nospam--at)seaint.org. Remember, any email you 
*   send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted 
*   without your permission. Make sure you visit our web 
*   site at: http://www.seaint.org