Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

Re: Exit facilities in wood

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Eric:


Table 2.3.2 of the 97 UBC doesn't allow a 1.25 increase.  The 1.25 increase
is specific to roof live loads.  

Is the cantilevered walkway also an exit route?  Check footnote 5 in Table
16-A.

Good to hear from you.


Neil Moore, S.E
neil moore and associates
consulting structural engineers.


>Regarding the design of wood beams for the exit live load of 100 psf, any
>comments on the following approach?:
>
>- Strength : check beam for 100 psf live load and a load duration factor of
>1.25 (seven days        duration).  This should be conservative as an
>emergency exit load is of very short duration.
>- Serviceability : check beam for 60 psf live load (this is a cantilevered
>walkway).  Who really cares what the deflection is in an emergency as long
>as everything holds up?
>
>
>Eric Lehmkuhl,  S.E.
>KPFF Consulting Engineers, San Diego
>(619) 521 8500 phone
>(619) 521 8591 fax
>eric_lehmkuhl(--nospam--at)kpff.com



* 
*   This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers 
*   Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To 
*   subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to:
*
*   http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp
*
*   Questions to seaint-ad(--nospam--at)seaint.org. Remember, any email you 
*   send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted 
*   without your permission. Make sure you visit our web 
*   site at: http://www.seaint.org