Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

RE: a passing

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Timoshenko was a mathematician, and approached his subject as an applied
mathematician would. He searched for "the elegant solution."

Popov was a structural engineer, and he approached the subject as "how do we
get the most workable solution?"

That's a huge difference, IMO.

William L. Polhemus, Jr., P.E.
Polhemus Engineering Company
Katy, Texas
Phone 281-492-2251
Fax 281-492-8203


-----Original Message-----
From: Padmanabhan Rajendran [mailto:rakamaka(--nospam--at)yahoo.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2001 3:13 PM
To: seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org
Subject: Re: a passing


I agree. I have a copy of that fine book since 1967.
At that time many others leaned towards Timoshenko's
book on the same subject, but I preferred Popov's.


* 
*   This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers 
*   Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To 
*   subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to:
*
*   http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp
*
*   Questions to seaint-ad(--nospam--at)seaint.org. Remember, any email you 
*   send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted 
*   without your permission. Make sure you visit our web 
*   site at: http://www.seaint.org