Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

Alternatives to Post-Tensioning Construction

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Developers in my area (i.e. Upper Mid-West, low seismic) are looking at building an 11-story condo near a river. I'm sure it will require deep foundations, but my question has to do with the superstructure.  They have looked at some existing condos as proto-types, and found one in Atlanta that they feel is a good model project. It is a post-tensioned superstructure. They sited the minimal floor-to-floor height, as well as, the good sound characteristics of the concrete system. 

There has been little to none post-tension construction in our area. One of the G.C.'s looking at construction costs was wondering if a more conventional design, such as a steel column/composite beam and deck system would be a viable alternative. I do not have any experience with post-tensioning, and would not be involved if the project went this direction, but was wondering what some of the advantages/disadvantages are in comparing these systems. 


*   This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers 
*   Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To 
*   subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to:
*   Questions to seaint-ad(--nospam--at) Remember, any email you 
*   send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted 
*   without your permission. Make sure you visit our web 
*   site at: