Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

Fw: Change in Dimension Lumber Design Values

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
I just realized I blew it on the original post (the analysis is OK).  Size
factor for 2x10's is 1.1 not 1.2.

Conrad

----- Original Message -----
From: "Conrad Guymon" <conrad(--nospam--at)karren.com>
To: <seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org>
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 11:51 AM
Subject: Change in Dimension Lumber Design Values


> I have been asked to evaluate a building constructed in 1963.  Design
> drawings indicate that Construction Grade D.F. 2x10's are to be used with
an
> allowable Fb of 1500 psi for the roof framing.  Current code accepted
values
> (1997 UBC) for Const. Grade D.F. 2x10's are Fb*Csubf=1000*1.2=1200 psi.
>
> The structure was designed for 30 psf snow,  and the current snow load
> requirement is 50 psf, (which is reasonable for the area).  I can show
that
> the structure works using the original design values, but not the current
> ones.  The building appears to be performing adequately, but I need
> something to justify the use of the higher original allowable stresses.
> I've been through the changes to the 1991 NDS, but the literature I can
find
> isn't much help.
>
> Does anyone have an explanation (with documentation) for the change in
> allowable stresses?
>
> Thanks
>
> Conrad Guymon, P.E.
>


* 
*   This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers 
*   Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To 
*   subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to:
*
*   http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp
*
*   Questions to seaint-ad(--nospam--at)seaint.org. Remember, any email you 
*   send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted 
*   without your permission. Make sure you visit our web 
*   site at: http://www.seaint.org