I just realized I blew it on the original post (the analysis is OK). Size
factor for 2x10's is 1.1 not 1.2.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Conrad Guymon" <conrad(--nospam--at)karren.com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 11:51 AM
Subject: Change in Dimension Lumber Design Values
> I have been asked to evaluate a building constructed in 1963. Design
> drawings indicate that Construction Grade D.F. 2x10's are to be used with
> allowable Fb of 1500 psi for the roof framing. Current code accepted
> (1997 UBC) for Const. Grade D.F. 2x10's are Fb*Csubf=1000*1.2=1200 psi.
> The structure was designed for 30 psf snow, and the current snow load
> requirement is 50 psf, (which is reasonable for the area). I can show
> the structure works using the original design values, but not the current
> ones. The building appears to be performing adequately, but I need
> something to justify the use of the higher original allowable stresses.
> I've been through the changes to the 1991 NDS, but the literature I can
> isn't much help.
> Does anyone have an explanation (with documentation) for the change in
> allowable stresses?
> Conrad Guymon, P.E.
* This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers
* Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To
* subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to:
* Questions to seaint-ad(--nospam--at)seaint.org. Remember, any email you
* send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted
* without your permission. Make sure you visit our web
* site at: http://www.seaint.org