Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

RE: Golf Course Bridge

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
That's why I still say I would look at H15 loading. It just makes sense.

William L. Polhemus, Jr., P.E.
Polhemus Engineering Company
Katy, Texas
Phone 281-492-2251
Fax 281-492-8203
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jonathan Mallard [mailto:jonathan.mallard(--nospam--at)rwhitehead.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 7:25 AM
> To: seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org
> Subject: RE: Golf Course Bridge
> 
> 
> Eric,
>  
> One thing to consider is the eventual intended use of the bridge.
>  
> No matter what they tell you the maximum loading will be, you can
> be assured that it will eventually see more.


* 
*   This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers 
*   Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To 
*   subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to:
*
*   http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp
*
*   Questions to seaint-ad(--nospam--at)seaint.org. Remember, any email you 
*   send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted 
*   without your permission. Make sure you visit our web 
*   site at: http://www.seaint.org