Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

RE: Golf Course Bridge

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
It is a "valid document" as long as it is recognized as such by the local
governing authority, I think. Hey, that could be: Here in Texas we still
have the odd jurisdiction that uses SBC 1973.

William L. Polhemus, Jr., P.E.
Polhemus Engineering Company
Katy, Texas
Phone 281-492-2251
Fax 281-492-8203


> -----Original Message-----
> From: syed faiz ahmad [mailto:syedfaiz23(--nospam--at)hotmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 4:52 PM
> To: seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org
> Subject: RE: Golf Course Bridge
>
>
> Well, as far as i know, ANSI A58.1 is a valid document though its
> replaced
> by ASCE COMMITTEE REPORT probably ASCE-7/95.
> SYED FAIZ AHMAD


* 
*   This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers 
*   Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To 
*   subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to:
*
*   http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp
*
*   Questions to seaint-ad(--nospam--at)seaint.org. Remember, any email you 
*   send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted 
*   without your permission. Make sure you visit our web 
*   site at: http://www.seaint.org