Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]


[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
So as not to be repetitive, I would simply refer you back to my many previous posts on this thread over the past few days.  My response to your earlier query was meant to be interpreted as:  "Yes, of course, calculations are prepared but not submitted".  If after reading all of this thread you still remain stunned, all I can offer is that the practice in California is indeed quite different than the practice elsewhere.  Lots of things are different in California than elsewhere.  Different strokes for different folks.  So be it!

when I heard the statements it was as incredible to me as our comment "Yes, Of Course!". Not submitting calculations that clearly reflect your design assumptions for submittal of anything other than a prescriptive method in California is unheard of. This is why I am so stunned to hear this. How do you verify that the structural materials are design in compliance with current code methods if the numbers can't be verified or the design method proven to  be in compliance? Do you look at a drag strap in a high wind region and say - "Well, this engineer must know what he is doing and therefore, until it fails or someone gets hurt, we will assume that he designed to the current code and that the strap is adequate based on trusting good faith?"
California engineers are used to being challenged on designs. If it doesn't look right and the calc's are missing, the engineer has the responsibility to prove to the plan check technician (or engineer) to justify the design. Anything less is, in my knowledge of submittals and plan check in California is incredible.
Dennis wrote:

I am assuming that calculations are performed, only not submitted.  Is this the case?


Stan Caldwell in Dallas

Beer is positive proof that God loves us!
                    ... Benjamin Franklin