Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

RE: PDA (Potentially OT)

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Charley Hamilton [mailto:chamilto(--nospam--at)]
> Sent: Friday, June 15, 2001 6:06 PM
> To: seaint(--nospam--at)
> Subject: Re: PDA (Potentially OT)
> Dennis, I honestly didn't read Bill's mail as explicit disdain for
> MS.  More as a difference of opinion on what PDA's should be.

Thank you for seconding my message. That is exactly what I was alluding to.

I repeat: MS doesn't have the vision for what the great majority of folks
want in a PDA. The "Windows Everywhere" doctrine, which is now almost ten
years old, requires that you fit the problem around the solution, instead of
the other way around.

I don't want and need a "palm-top computer." I need a Personal Digital
Assistant. I'm not "everybody," but I'll wager my attitude represents over
80% of those who are in the market for a palm-type device.

William L. Polhemus, Jr., P.E.
Polhemus Engineering Company
Katy, Texas
Phone 281-492-2251
Fax 281-492-8203

*   This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers 
*   Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To 
*   subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to:
*   Questions to seaint-ad(--nospam--at) Remember, any email you 
*   send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted 
*   without your permission. Make sure you visit our web 
*   site at: