From: Scott Maxwell <smaxwell(--nospam--at)engin.umich.edu>
Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 23:07:24 -0400 (EDT)
That is interesting.
I always thought that the drive size that could be used was more a matter
of the OS limitations (definitely know this is true on Mac systems, but
also thought it was true for Windoze/DOS systems too). I am not aware of
any reason that the motherboard would limit the drive size. You may want
to investigate this more before shelling out $$ for a new motherboard.
If you share more details of your system, I will see if I can assist with
my limited expertise <grin>. If I can't help, then I can always talk to
our IT people.
On Sun, 24 Jun 2001, Bill Polhemus wrote:
> Well, for all intents in purposes the point is now moot.
> I bought the hard drive, and my attempts to install it have failed. The new
> drive is a 40GB Maxtor. Put it in, nothing happened, I fiddled and fooled,
> then read a bit, and finally came across some clues--not outright
> information, but comments in passing.
> My system apparently won't support a drive this size! I don't know what size
> it WILL support, but it won't do this one! (The docs said something about an
> 8.4GB barrier, but the drive it came with was 10GB, so that can't be it).
> All I know is the 40GB won't work, and there is no newer system bios
> So there IS a real, live example of "functional obsolescence!" I am now
> going to have to buy a new motherboard for the simple reason that I can't
> live with a small drive anymore (yes, I know, I could use a second drive,
> but under Windoze that is SO yucky! It's simplicity itself under Linux,
> where partitions are transparent to the user, but who the h*** wants to
> remember whether your stuff is on the C: drive or D:? Hm, I just remembered
> why I would like all my apps to be available under Linux!)
> Anyway, I'm ticked off about this. I was half-convinced that I wasn't being
> "left behind" sticking with this 400MHz computer; now I'm back to square
> one. Sheesh.
> William L. Polhemus, Jr., P.E.
> Polhemus Engineering Company
> Katy, Texas
> Phone 281-492-2251
> Fax 281-492-8203
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Scott Maxwell [mailto:smaxwell(--nospam--at)engin.umich.edu]
> > Sent: Sunday, June 24, 2001 8:59 PM
> > To: seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org
> > Subject: RE: Q: Moving To A Larger Hard Drive
> > True, but they are NOTHING like issues with Windoze machines.
> * This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers
> * Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To
> * subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to:
> * http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp
> * Questions to seaint-ad(--nospam--at)seaint.org. Remember, any email you
> * send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted
> * without your permission. Make sure you visit our web
> * site at: http://www.seaint.org
* This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers
* Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To
* subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to:
* Questions to seaint-ad(--nospam--at)seaint.org. Remember, any email you
* send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted
* without your permission. Make sure you visit our web
* site at: http://www.seaint.org