Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

RE: Competing Codes

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
I can't speak for water or telecommunication towers but for metal buildings, they are routinely designed for the specified code of the area (UBC, SBC, BOCA/NBC, IBC, ASCE7, NC, NY, Wisconsin, NBCC, etc...).  Typically they would be designed for the MBMA code when no other local code is specified or required, then the MBMA would be used as a minimum design criteria. 
For some buildings, they are designed for both codes (local and MBMA) by using the more stringent criteria of the two (or more) codes for specific areas.  Metal buildings are held to the same standard of building codes as any conventional building.  Most reputible metal building companies do follow similar criteria.
Greg Effland, P.E.
-----Original Message-----
From: Randy Russ [mailto:rruss(--nospam--at)]
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 10:46 AM
To: seaint
Subject: Competing Codes

Paragraph 1606.1.1 of the Standard Build Code states, "Wind forces on every building or structure shall be determined by the provisions of ASCE 7." Five exceptions to this are then listed. Nowhere in the exceptions are telecommunication towers, water towers or metal buildings. I suspect other building codes are similar to SBC in this regard.
Telecommunications towers are routinely designed for EIA/TIA-222-F. Water towers use a code put out by AWWA. Metal building manufacturers design to an MBMA code.
My question is this. By what legal authority are these other codes allowed? I am somewhat familiar with EIA/TIA. In the first paragraph they state that "....these standards are not intended to replace or supersede applicable codes." If the EIA/TIA code is used without checking against ASCE 7, isn't that superseding?
Randy Russ
Russ Engineering Group, Inc.
Baton Rouge, La.