Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

Re: flag-pole

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
The best source of information is put out by The National Association of
Archiotectural Metal Manufacturers (NAAMM) "Guide Specifications For Design
of Metal Flagpoles" Publication FP 1001-97.

Randy Russ
Russ Engineering Group, Inc.
Baton Rouge, La.
-----Original Message-----
From: Puebla Raul <rpuebla(--nospam--at)cee.gov.ec>
To: seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org <seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org>
Date: Monday, September 17, 2001 2:04 PM
Subject: flag-pole


>
>
>Hi Everyone,
>
>If anyone can help me.
>What considerations  With Respect to wind pressure I need to make  for to
>realize the analysis and design a flag pole of heigh 50 meters in steel .
>with wind of 80 kph. The flag is 8x6 meters..
>
>Thank you very much in advance,
>
>Marino Puebla
>Ecuador Sudamerica
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>-----Mensaje original-----
>De: Ron Hill [mailto:ronhill(--nospam--at)hillce.com]
>Enviado el: Lunes, 17 de Septiembre de 2001 12:49
>Para: seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org
>Asunto: RE: Natural Frequency
>
>For "flag-pole" type (first mode) I find the Modified Rayleigh Method as
>noted in Biggs "Introduction to Structural Dynamic" is a good one.  You
load
>the structure in the horizontal direction with the dead load and determine
>the deflections.  You can use your general FEM program to calculate
>deflections.
>
>
>Ronald Hill, P.E.
>HILL Consulting Engineering
>Birmingham, Alabama  USA
>Phone: 205.823.4784
>FAX: 205.823.4145
>Email: ronhill(--nospam--at)hillce.com
>Efax: 509.275.8095
>http:\\www.hillce.com
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Padmanabhan Rajendran [mailto:rakamaka(--nospam--at)yahoo.com]
>Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 12:29 PM
>To: seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org
>Subject: Re: Natural Frequency
>
>
>Anyone out there who can give me the formula for
>natural frequency of a tapered cantilever member
>(Larger end at the clamped edge)?
>(1) self weight only
>(2) with a concentrated load at the tip
>
>Thanks.
>
>Rajendran
>
>P.S. I have derived it from first principles, using
>the book by Clough & Penzien, but the math being
>complicated, I want to check my results.
>
>___
>
>
>
>*
>*   This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers
>*   Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To
>*   subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to:
>*
>*   http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp
>*
>*   Questions to seaint-ad(--nospam--at)seaint.org. Remember, any email you
>*   send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted
>*   without your permission. Make sure you visit our web
>*   site at: http://www.seaint.org
>
>*
>*   This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers
>*   Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To
>*   subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to:
>*
>*   http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp
>*
>*   Questions to seaint-ad(--nospam--at)seaint.org. Remember, any email you
>*   send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted
>*   without your permission. Make sure you visit our web
>*   site at: http://www.seaint.org
>


* 
*   This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers 
*   Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To 
*   subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to:
*
*   http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp
*
*   Questions to seaint-ad(--nospam--at)seaint.org. Remember, any email you 
*   send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted 
*   without your permission. Make sure you visit our web 
*   site at: http://www.seaint.org