Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...

Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

RE: Vibration problems

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Christopher Wright is right.  I replied before my coffee took effect.

Regards,
Harold O. Sprague

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Christopher Wright [SMTP:chrisw(--nospam--at)skypoint.com]
> Sent:	Tuesday, October 02, 2001 11:31 AM
> To:	SEAOC Newsletter
> Subject:	RE: Vibration problems
> 
> >A cheaper solution would be
> >to first try to add mass to the platform.  You are correct in that for a
> >given forcing function the 2 methods of control are stiffness and mass.
> >Vibration dampers control the stiffness.
> I'm gonna stick my neck way out and quibble with Harold Sprague, but 
> adding mass to the platform lowers the natural frequency of the system. 
> And vibration dampers control amplitude at resonance by absorbing 
> energy--no effect on frequency. You can add mass to move a resonance 
> point below some fixed excitation frequency, but that's about it. I've 
> also seen shock mounts which are soft enough to decrease a frequency but 
> the trade-off is that the displacements tend to increase as the 
> accelerations drop off, which may not be desirable.
> 
> Increasing a structural frequency by a factor of two is a tricky job. 
> Since the frequency goes with the square root of stiffness/mass, you'll 
> need to decrease the mass by a factor of four, since your stiffness is 
> fixed. The fact that some of your mass is in the roof girders makes it 
> even tougher. 
> 
> I've tried increasing structural frequencies a few times with machinery 
> and invariably ran into the fact that it's very difficult to add 
> stiffness without adding mass. If you double the stiffness and increase 
> the mass by, say, 30%, your frequency increase is only about 25%. You 
> might try looking at your frequency assesment and make sure you haven't 
> over-simplified it. It's very tempting to assume pinned supports and 
> ignore inconveniently complicated support conditions, but I suspect 
> you'll be very hard-pressed to increase the frequency as much as you want 
> if you fail to take advantage of everything. You might want to try 
> attaching your platform to a stiffer point on the girder, closer to the 
> girder supports. Could be your platform mass could be decreased, too.
> 
> Christopher Wright P.E.    |"They couldn't hit an elephant from
> chrisw(--nospam--at)skypoint.com        | this distance"   (last words of Gen.
> ___________________________| John Sedgwick, Spotsylvania 1864)
> http://www.skypoint.com/~chrisw
> 
> 

******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* ***
*   Read list FAQ at: http://www.seaint.org/list_FAQ.asp
* 
*   This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers 
*   Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To 
*   subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to:
*
*   http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp
*
*   Questions to seaint-ad(--nospam--at)seaint.org. Remember, any email you 
*   send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted 
*   without your permission. Make sure you visit our web 
*   site at: http://www.seaint.org 
******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ********