Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...

Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

STAAD-Concrete sectional properties

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
I am reviewing the STAAD input for a Reinforced Concrete six story
industrial building and have a few questions that I hope someone can answer.
1.  Is it usual practice to use the member properties in ACI 10.11.1?

2.  Section R8.6.1 talks about using gross section properties for all
members in braced frames. My building has two parallel shear walls in the
east-west direction (in combination with moment resisting frame) and only a
moment resisting frame in north-south direction. Can I use gross section

3.	STAAD PDelta analysis has been performed. The engineer who done this
analysis informed me that the PDelta analysis in STAAD takes into account
(automatically) reduced section properties due to cracking, therefore it is
acceptable to input gross section properties. Is this correct?

4.	I reviewed the UCB on this subject. Section 1633.2.4 states that flexural
and shear properties shall not exceed one half of the gross section
properties unless a rational cracked-section analysis is performed. Could
someone explain to me what a rational cracked-section analysis is.

5.	Section 1910.11.1 of the UCB gives similar member properties as ACI
10.11.1 but seems to contradict the requirements of UCB Section 1633.2.4
i.e. using 50% of gross. Can someone clarify this for me.

Thanks in advance for any help.

John Holliday  P.E.

******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* ***
*   Read list FAQ at:
*   This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers 
*   Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To 
*   subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to:
*   Questions to seaint-ad(--nospam--at) Remember, any email you 
*   send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted 
*   without your permission. Make sure you visit our web 
*   site at: 
******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ********