To: "'seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org'" <seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org>
Subject: RE: Operating System Reccomendation Sought
From: Paul Pilarski <PPilarski(--nospam--at)HNTB.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 17:48:37 -0600
Installed Win XP Prof. on same computer as Win98SE (350 MHz, old video card
and modem) and have noticed much greater stability - and no irrecoverable
blue screen errors. Works even though hardware was not on Microsoft's
compatability list. Should have 256MB RAM, though.
Paul J. Pilarski
600 108th Avenue NE Tel: (425) 450-2592
Suite 400 Fax: (425) 453-9179
Bellevue, WA 98004 E-MAIL: ppilarski(--nospam--at)hntb.com
From: David Williams [mailto:dwilliams(--nospam--at)snydereng.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 3:18 PM
Subject: RE: Operating System Reccomendation Sought
A year ago, I was running Windows 98 and experienced crashes on a regular
basis. I was running Office 2000, AutoCAD 14/2000, RAM Structural and a
variety of other software. I also had a P3-166 w/128 meg RAM. I switched
to a P3-733 and Windows 2000 several months ago and can count the number of
crashes since then on one hand. Our server is still running 98 and still
crashes on occasion. I just got Windows XP at home but don't have much
experience with it yet. It seems to be fairly stable so far. I'm not an
expert on OS's, I just know 2000 has been much more stable for me than 98
was. Take this FWIW.
David L. Williams, P.E.
Vice-Pres., Snyder Engineering, Inc.
409 Vandiver Drive, Bldg. 5, Ste 203
Columbia, MO 65202
From: Keith De Lapp [mailto:kdl(--nospam--at)directcon.net]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 4:28 PM
Subject: Operating System Reccomendation Sought
So, I have this non-engineering question. I am desperately calling upon my
fellow engineering brethren to help me out.
I recently had a computer hard drive die on me and had to start over. That
being the case, I asked a couple of people whether I should stay with Widows
98 or change to Windows 2000 or XP in hopes of stabilizing the platform. I
was amazed at the lack of consensus among the response I received.
So here I go. Firstly, I do not wish to create a kind of LORD vs. ASD
debate. I am simply at a crossroads, and sincerely want to improve the
stability of this silly box my life seems to be so dependent upon.
3 computers - 1 server & 2 work stations - with potential to add two more
over the next 18 months.
Windows 98 - Server, P3-350 w/ 256 megs of ram
Windows 98se - Work Station #1, P3-733 w/ 256 megs of ram
Windows 98se - Work Station #2, P3-650 w/ 256 megs of ram
planned new work station, P4-2000 w/ 512 megs of ram
Data is kept on Work Station #1 and the server is used for print sharing and
My question. #1) Do I change to Windows 2000 on all machines. #2) Do I
change to XP on all machines. #3) Or, do I stick with Window 98 and
upgrade the server to 98se.
The goal is to stabilize each individual machine. The network seems to work
just fine. It's the annoying little hang-ups, lock-ups and crashes that bug
the day-lights out of me. I don't know for sure if it is the software that
creates these problems or the operating system. I am lucky that I haven't
lost any data (yet). The machines do not handle opening and closing several
applications at the same time without noticeable memory leak and we have to
occasional reboot to get 'em humming again.
The software I'm running seems to be fairly standard for our industry.
AutoCAD LT2000, Office 2000, Visual Analysis 4, Quick Books 99, Backup Exec,
Outlook, Internet Explorer, Digital Camera stuff, 3 different printers (all
HP) and "plug and play" stuff (yeah, right).
I of course don't want to trade stability for conflicts. Seems to me that
in the era of the P4, I should be able to have both.
The former Microsoft employee programmer next door says 2000 all the way.
The owner of the computer store where I buy my stuff says 98se, but he likes
XP the more he plays with it and don't even think of 2000.
The kid who cleans my office and is a self proclaimed guru (he actually
fixed a major crash and showed me that even though my computer would not
boot up because it couldn't find my hard drive that it was actually not my
hard drive, so he has earned some credibility bucks with me, and he is only
16 year old, amazing!) recommends XP and staying away from 98se and says
even 95 would be better than 98se.
Please help!! I am pretty good at tinkering with hardware and drivers for
peripherals and loading software without blowing things up. But, I am no
means an expert. Also, since the system is so small, I would rather
administer it myself than hire it out.
Thanks in advance for your input.
This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are NOT the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering the e-mail to the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this e-mail in error and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited.
******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* ***
* Read list FAQ at: http://www.seaint.org/list_FAQ.asp
* This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers
* Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To
* subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to:
* Questions to seaint-ad(--nospam--at)seaint.org. Remember, any email you
* send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted
* without your permission. Make sure you visit our web
* site at: http://www.seaint.org
******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ********