Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

Re: SEAINT List Server Becoming Less Functional?

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Bill:

I agree with your obsevations.

One Explanation:  In the beginning, there were a lot of good questions,
answers, and discussions.  A lot of good people participated.  Then the
discussions seemed to be dominated by 1997 UBC issues.  Then the
discussions degenerated into multi-page attacks on the code committees,
followed by multi-page personal attacks on the individual committee
members.  At this point, a lot of good people either left the List Server
or chose to "lurk" and not participate.

Alternate Explanation: People can't understand Texan humor  :)

Rick Drake, SE
Fluor Daniel, Aliso Viejo, CA

*******************************




                    "Bill Polhemus"
                    <bill@polhemus.      To:     <seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org>
                    cc>
                    02/26/02 03:39       cc:
                    PM
                    Please respond       Subject:     SEAINT List Server Becoming Less Functional?.
                    to seaint
                                                                                                                 .





Please excuse what I hope will be seen as constructive criticism, but I
have
noticed something that I find disheartening.

If this were only my own experience, I'd just shrug it off, but I have
noticed signs that others are seeing the same thing I am, and I wonder what
you all think is happening.

>From the time I first s*bscribed to SEAINT (back when it was still called
SEAOC), it has been one of the MOST useful reference tools at my disposal,
because the people participating on the list represent a cross section of
structural engineering expertise from the very experienced to the
youthfully
inquisitive. I have found over that time that there was literally no
problem
that had me stumped, that some one or several people participating on this
list couldn't help with. I have to say with all candor that the "bang for
the buck" ratio has been tremendous, so much so that I decided to "give
back" by joining my local SEA chapter.

However, in the last six months or so I've noticed that when I post a
question or problem to the list, I now can only count on getting a response
MAYBE 50% of the time. And I do not think that it is because my questions
have been of any different nature than previously.

As I said, it would be one thing if I thought it was only me, but
increasingly I see posts to the list with the comment "I posted this
question earlier and got no response, so I'm trying again." Recent examples
of this would include the threads titled "REPOST: Steel Lintel Bearing on
Masonry" and "Repost: Flat-plate structure - sway analysis". There have
been
others, many others.

Now, I'm not saying that ALL my post aren't being responded to. I am still
getting a lot of great info, but there have been a few instances, such as
the message I posted this morning wanting opinions regarding the
responsibility of the EOR to anticipate construction loading, that haven't
gotten ANY responses, such that I end up having to fly blind when I could
really use the help.

I'm just interested in opinions (again) as to why some of you think this
might be so. Do you think you're not responding as quickly or as often as
you used to do? Is the bloom off the rose as far as electronic discussions
like this?

What do you think?



William L. Polhemus, Jr. P.E.
Polhemus Engineering Company
Katy, TX, USA
Phone (281) 492-2251
FAX (281) 492-8203
email bill(--nospam--at)polhemus.cc



******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* ***
*   Read list FAQ at: http://www.seaint.org/list_FAQ.asp
*
*   This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers
*   Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To
*   subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to:
*
*   http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp
*
*   Questions to seaint-ad(--nospam--at)seaint.org. Remember, any email you
*   send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted
*   without your permission. Make sure you visit our web
*   site at: http://www.seaint.org
******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ********





-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The information transmitted is intended only for the person
or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential
and/or privileged material. If you are not the intended recipient
of this message you are hereby notified that any use, review,
retransmission, dissemination, distribution, reproduction or any
action taken in reliance upon this message is prohibited. If you
received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the
material from any computer.  Any views expressed in this message
are those of the individual sender and may not necessarily reflect
the views of the company.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* ***
*   Read list FAQ at: http://www.seaint.org/list_FAQ.asp
*
*   This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers
*   Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To
*   subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to:
*
*   http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp
*
*   Questions to seaint-ad(--nospam--at)seaint.org. Remember, any email you
*   send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted
*   without your permission. Make sure you visit our web
*   site at: http://www.seaint.org
******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ********