Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...

Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

RE: OMRF (R value)

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
>Something to think about for those
>of you not familiar with the Southern
>California landscape: there are OVER
>have adopted legislation making them
>closer to "State of the Art" (whatever
>that is), others are just happy to
>have a PE stamp on a set of plans.


I agree with your sentiments. Consider something: I think we could have a
very efficient code cycle and have everything in it state of the art if
localities big and small recognize that they do not have expertise needed to
rewrite, revise and modify the national standards that get written. Rather,
those localities should actively participate in the national processes that
result in the IBC, NFPA, AISC, ACI, and other documents. That is actually
the intent of the model code process.

The further benefit to that would be that we would not have to master subtle
and needless differences in design requirements when crossing the street
from county to county or town to town.


******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* ***
*   Read list FAQ at:
*   This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers 
*   Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To 
*   subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to:
*   Questions to seaint-ad(--nospam--at) Remember, any email you 
*   send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted 
*   without your permission. Make sure you visit our web 
*   site at: 
******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ********