Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...

Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

RE: OMRF (R value)

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
That said, we also need to recognize that you can only coax, you can't

The Model Codes are there for the benefit of the public entity, not the
other way around. In the end, all the arguing and haranguing that goes into
the consensus that is the Model Code often simply nullifies certain
approaches to design that may well have merit. Neither the design
professional nor the public official in charge of administering the code
should have their hands tied because a faction on the other side of the
continent saw things differently.

William L. Polhemus, Jr. P.E.
Polhemus Engineering Company
Katy, TX, USA
Phone (281) 492-2251
FAX (281) 492-8203
email bill(--nospam--at)

-----Original Message-----
From: Carter, Charlie [mailto:carter(--nospam--at)]
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 7:26 AM
To: 'seaint(--nospam--at)'
Subject: RE: OMRF (R value)

The further benefit to that would be that we would not have to master subtle
and needless differences in design requirements when crossing the street
from county to county or town to town.

******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* ***
*   Read list FAQ at:
*   This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers 
*   Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To 
*   subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to:
*   Questions to seaint-ad(--nospam--at) Remember, any email you 
*   send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted 
*   without your permission. Make sure you visit our web 
*   site at: 
******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ********