Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...

Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

Re: Re-issuing Certification Letter

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
The GVT is responsoble for losing the document. We ( the engineer) are
simply dating the document we are signing now.
Chris Lillback
Of course perhaps the govening agency could so state on their own doc :)

----- Original Message -----
From: "G Vishwanath" <gvshwnth(--nospam--at)yahoo.com>
To: <seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org>
Sent: Sunday, July 14, 2002 9:19 PM
Subject: Re: Re-issuing Certification Letter


> I am also not street smart and only a dumb engineer
> and may be I can't see beyond my drawings and
> calculations.
>
> But...
>
> If what was signed and sealed a year ago was correct,
> and we see no reason to change our mind regarding
> anything it contained, what could be the problem in
> signing it once again and putting the same date and
> stamp if the Govt Agency requests it?
>
> It may help win the goodwill of the Government agency.
> May be they have misplaced the document and find it
> embarrassing to admit it.
>
> If this helps the project or client, and does not
> compromise our interest or the client's interest,  why
> not accede to this request?
>
> Don't we print and send out additional copies of
> drawings at a later date without changing the original
> dates on the drawings?
>
> Maybe we are exposing ourselves to the charge that
> documents one year old are being sent NOW.
>
> But that could be sorted out with a covering letter
> clearly stating that these docuemnts  are being sent
> again with the same date because of a specific request
> and we can give reference to that request.
>
> Innocent, inexperienced in the ways of the world,
> curious and willing to be enlightened,
>
> G Vishwanath
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Autos - Get free new car price quotes
> http://autos.yahoo.com
>
> ******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* ***
> *   Read list FAQ at: http://www.seaint.org/list_FAQ.asp
> *
> *   This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers
> *   Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To
> *   subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to:
> *
> *   http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp
> *
> *   Questions to seaint-ad(--nospam--at)seaint.org. Remember, any email you
> *   send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted
> *   without your permission. Make sure you visit our web
> *   site at: http://www.seaint.org
> ******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ********
>


******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* ***
*   Read list FAQ at: http://www.seaint.org/list_FAQ.asp
* 
*   This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers 
*   Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To 
*   subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to:
*
*   http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp
*
*   Questions to seaint-ad(--nospam--at)seaint.org. Remember, any email you 
*   send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted 
*   without your permission. Make sure you visit our web 
*   site at: http://www.seaint.org 
******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ********