Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...

# Re: Continuous Beams in Residential Cons

• To: seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org
• Subject: Re: Continuous Beams in Residential Cons
• From: Roger Turk <73527.1356(--nospam--at)compuserve.com>
• Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 12:28:42 -0500

```Gary,

AISC publishes (published) a booklet, "Moments, Shears, and Reactions for
Continuous Highway Bridges," publication No. T106.  The title is actually a
misnomer as the booklet has tables of influence coefficients for 2-span to
4-span continuous beams of various length ratios.  The 2-span table goes from
equal spans to the longer span being 1.7 times the shorter span.

The reaction coefficients are multiplied by the product of the uniform load
per unit length and the length of the *shorter* span to obtain the reaction.

The reaction coefficient for end reaction with two equal spans uniformly

The reaction coefficient for the end reaction of the shorter span with the
longer span 10 percent longer than the shorter span is, .3613

20 percent longer:  .3450
30 percent longer:  .3263
50 percent longer:  .2812
70 percent longer:  .2263

Even in this range of relative span lengths, there is only a 15 percent
difference in the end reaction of the shorter span.

For only the longer span loaded, the uplift coefficients for the end reaction
of the shorter span range from -.0625 (equal spans) to -.2275 (longer span
1.7 times shorter span), still only about a 15 percent difference.

HTH

A. Roger Turk, P.E.(Structural)
Tucson, Arizona

Gary Hodgson wrote:

. > I have run into situations, particularly in house construction, where
. > continuous beams of unequal length have been
. > used.  Where there is a long span and a short span, you usually get a
. > kick-up (uplift) at the end of the short
. > span.  Unless you can hold the beam end down, you get a bump in the
. > floor. Consequently, I try to avoid these
. > particular continuous beams.

. > I read somewhere once, that to help avoid this situation, the continuous
. > beam spans should not vary by more than
. > 15%.  I would like to find that piece of literature again.  Can anybody
. > help me with this?  Unfortunately, I don't
. > remember if it was Canadian or American.

. > Thanks,
. > Gary Hodgson, P.Eng.
. > Niagara Falls, ON

******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* ***
*   Read list FAQ at: http://www.seaint.org/list_FAQ.asp
*
*   This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers
*   Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To
*   subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to:
*
*   http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp
*
*   Questions to seaint-ad(--nospam--at)seaint.org. Remember, any email you
*   send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted