Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...
RE: FW: Fire ratings to UBC 1997[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- To: "'seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org'" <seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org>
- Subject: RE: FW: Fire ratings to UBC 1997
- From: "Yousefi, Ben" <Ben.Yousefi(--nospam--at)ci.sj.ca.us>
- Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2003 07:55:11 -0800
The main reason open parking structures are given so much latitude is that they are the only occupancy that is permitted in a building. This means that you cannot mix the parking with any other types of occupancy such as business, mercantile or residential in one building. The building should exclusively be used for the parking of cars. That way you’ll reduce the chance of loosing life or injury to occupants, which is the main intent of the code. At least that’s how the UBC provisions are written.
Ben Yousefi, SE
San Jose, CA
that I have never understood:
- Prev by Subject: Re: FW: Fire ratings to UBC 1997
- Next by Subject: RE: FW: Fire ratings to UBC 1997
- Previous by thread: Re: FW: Fire ratings to UBC 1997
- Next by thread: RE: FW: Fire ratings to UBC 1997