Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...

Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

Re: Masonry fireplaces and chimneys, Fp calcs

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
• To: <seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org>
• Subject: Re: Masonry fireplaces and chimneys, Fp calcs
• From: "Ray Shreenan" <rshreenan(--nospam--at)earthlink.net>
• Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 18:01:29 -0800

```Thor,

Use a wood frame stucco chase (chimney) with a class B metal flue.  Very
light compared to masonry and if you want the masonry appearance use a thin
brick or stone veneer epoxied to the Portland  cement stucco.

Hope this helps.

Ray Shreenan  SE
----- Original Message -----
From: "Thor Matteson, SE" <matteson(--nospam--at)yosemite.net>
To: "SEAINT" <seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org>
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 9:22 PM
Subject: Masonry fireplaces and chimneys, Fp calcs

> A couple of new Code editions have come along since I moved from the worst
> seismic zone to the second-worst, whereupon wind forces came to govern
most
> of my lateral designs.
>
> In the 1991 UBC, the equation for figuring F-sub-p for seismic force on a
> portion of a structure was :  Fp=Z*I*Cp*Wp
>
> In Zone 4 for things besides cantilevered  parapets, this typically gave a
> value of Fp=0.3*Wp.  (0.225*Wp in Zone 3.....)
>
> The 1997 UBC and the beloved 2001 Calif. Bldg. Code give one formula for
> Fp=4*Ca*Ip*Wp, which gives a value in Zone 3 of Fp=4*0.36*I*Wp/1.4  for
ASD,
> or Fp=1.03*Wp for typical soil and importance factors.
>
> This more than quadruples the design lateral force, from what I can tell
> after reviewing the SEAOC Blue Book and triple-checking myself....  What I
> am hoping is that someone on the List  will really embarrass me by saying,
> "you forgot to multiply by the 'Omicron-Theta-prime-sub-nought factor'
that
> will bring your forces back down so Fp=0.38*Wp."
>
> I just designed a replacement chimney for a house--the original suffered
> from a car crash--and the footing needed to be 9 x 11 feet to resist
> overturning.  The existing house has skip-sheathing on the roof, so I
could
> not anchor at the roof diaphragm level.  The contractor does not want to
> undermine half the house to pour this enormous footing.  ("Good-old-days"
> footing size would have been about 4 x 5 feet, 1/5 the concrete and
> excavation)
>
> I envision the Fp from masonry chimneys  exceeding the base shear for the
> entire house in some cases.  For this particular chimney, if  I actually
had
> a roof diaphragm, I would need to strap the chimney to the roof framing
for
> about 10,000 pounds.
>
> Please tell me whether I have finally gone crazy on my own, or we have all
> gone crazy together.
>
> Thor Matteson
>
> http://www.shearwalls.com
>
>
> ******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* ***
> *   Read list FAQ at: http://www.seaint.org/list_FAQ.asp
> *
> *   This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers
> *   Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To
> *   subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to:
> *
> *   http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp
> *
> *   Questions to seaint-ad(--nospam--at)seaint.org. Remember, any email you
> *   send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted
> *   without your permission. Make sure you visit our web
> *   site at: http://www.seaint.org
> ******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ********

******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* ***
*   Read list FAQ at: http://www.seaint.org/list_FAQ.asp
*
*   This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers
*   Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To
*   subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to:
*
*   http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp
*
*   Questions to seaint-ad(--nospam--at)seaint.org. Remember, any email you
*   send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted
*   without your permission. Make sure you visit our web
*   site at: http://www.seaint.org
******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ********

```