Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...
Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]
Re: MATRIX ANALYSIS
[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]- To: seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org
- Subject: Re: MATRIX ANALYSIS
- From: Roger Turk <73527.1356(--nospam--at)compuserve.com>
- Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 11:42:36 -0400
Christopher Wright wrote: . > Check three things-- . > Force equilibrium overall . > Member force equilibrium . > For a few selected joints, check the force balance on the node points. . > Also check a few of the members for proper displacements. But, what if the person that wrote the program had the program check for equilibrium unbalance in these items and distributed the unbalance in some manner just to make the statics work out? The statics would always check out, but the program may be completely wrong because the programmer was unable to find the error in his/her code. (Checking for unbalance due to rounding errors is a common procedure in programming, whether it is in structural analysis or in computing payroll taxes.) The first engineering program that I wrote was a FORTRAN program for a uniformly loaded square flat plate, ideal for a computer because the equations were all infinite series. My answers were only slightly different from the results of Timoshenko, and we all know that Timo is right! Going thru the program again and again, I finally focused on the code to raise -1 to an integer power. We all know that the easiest number to raise to an integer power is 1, and the second easiest is -1. In those days we were given some idea of how the compiler handled certain operations. When the FORTRAN code indicated that a number was to be raised to a power, the compiler took the logarithm of the number, expressed as an infinite series, multiplied the logarithm by the exponent, then took the anti-log of the product, again expressed as an infinite series. However, the logarithm of a negative number does not exist! I revised the code to have the -1 raised to an integer power alternate between -1 and 1 and the answers immediately agreed with Timo's. . > The reason you don't want to check it against another program is that you . > can never be sure which one's right. I agree with your final premise, but would add, "... or if both are wrong." ******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* *** * Read list FAQ at: http://www.seaint.org/list_FAQ.asp * * This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers * Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To * subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to: * * http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp * * Questions to seaint-ad(--nospam--at)seaint.org. Remember, any email you * send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted * without your permission. Make sure you visit our web * site at: http://www.seaint.org ******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ********
- Prev by Subject: RE: MATRIX ANALYSIS
- Next by Subject: Re: MATRIX ANALYSIS
- Previous by thread: Re: MATRIX ANALYSIS
- Next by thread: Re: MATRIX ANALYSIS
- About this archive
- Messages sorted by: [Subject][Thread][Author][Date]