Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...

Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

Question about brace design forces for columns

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Could someone please explain to me where the
rule-of-thumb that column braces be designed for 2% of
the column vertical load comes from? (I think in Great
Britain there is a code requirement to use a value of

If 1:500 out-of-plumbness is allowed, then a brace
that's restraining the top of one column and the
bottom of another column (which are each kinked 1:500
out of plumb in a ?V? shape) will have a theoretical
brace force of 0.4%.  Assuming that you impose a brace
stiffness requirement that restricts brace deformation
(and additional associated horizontal column movement
at the brace connection) to another 1:1000, you would
still only have a theoretical brace force of 0.6%. Is
the 2% rule of thumb used to provide a safey factor
(of about 3) on the very critical brace member, or to
account for other unanticipated lateral deformations
at or near the brace connection?  Maybe I just
answered my own question, but I?d like to get some
opinions on this issue.

Also, does anyone know why there are no codified brace
force design requirements in U.S. codes and standards?
The European codes all seem to provide specific design
criteria for braces.


Cliff Schiwnger 

Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software

******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* ***
*   Read list FAQ at:
*   This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers 
*   Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To 
*   subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to:
*   Questions to seaint-ad(--nospam--at) Remember, any email you 
*   send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted 
*   without your permission. Make sure you visit our web 
*   site at: 
******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ********