Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...
Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]
Re: Contact loads from moving loads
[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]- To: <seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org>
- Subject: Re: Contact loads from moving loads
- From: "John H. Cato, jr, R.A." <jcato(--nospam--at)accessatc.net>
- Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2003 12:35:47 -0400
Joe, I've read the other responses (as of this morning). One possible other 'approach'... Background: One of my hobbies is rocketry (from model up to bigger stuff) and one of my main interests therein is recovery. The hobby had a history of failed recoveries and I set out to try to find out why. Did some extensive research on impact loading - strength of textile materials, etc. One thing that surfaced from that research effort was the concept of "Equivalent Static Load" (ESL) to quantify the energies of moving objects 'hitting the end' - what describes parachutes inflating and imposing shock loads to the 'connectors' (textile here) -- but that also seems to describe a log 'hitting the end' (your 'stop'). That generally reduced to a 'Impact Factor' (I.F.) that was nothing more elaborate than a 'multiplier' of the static load (tied to the static deflection). There were two ways it was expressed - either related to distance fallen or velocity of impact. This second seems to fit here. The equation was: I.F. = SQRT (v^2 / (g * d(st))) SQRT= square root v = velocity (INCHES per second) g = gravitational acceleration (INCHES per second) d(st) = STATIC deflection (inches) (don't forget to convert all terms to INCHES) then... ESL = SL * I.F. ESL= Equivalent Static Load SL = Static Load At that point, you would simply design the 'stop' to a larger load than the actual static load of the object under consideration. =-=-=-=-= Now, I haven't given much thought to how this 'vertical' situation may or may not translate into the 'horizontal' situation you are facing (and it would seem the 'g' term gets curious in this regard). Nevertheless, it seems the concept here (ESL) would have applicability - and maybe give you a point of departure for further research (or spur discussion here). It would seem, at the very least, that a log hitting a stop horizontal (at 200 fpm) is little different than a log falling vertically and hitting that same stop (at 200 fpm) - at least from the standpoint of assessing the minimum strength needed of that stop. HTH, -- john. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Joseph Grill" <j.grill(--nospam--at)comcast.net> To: <seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org> Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2003 8:24 AM Subject: Re: Contact loads from moving loads > Thanks Scott and Steve, > > I've gotten that far with this and with other problems of a similar nature. > I was just hoping that from that last guard rail type problem someone has > joined the list with a great "snap your fingers" easy way to go about it. > Guess I'm back to armwave the movement to get an answer. > > Thanks > Joe > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Scott Maxwell" <smaxwell(--nospam--at)engin.umich.edu> > To: <seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org> > Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 10:35 PM > Subject: Re: Contact loads from moving loads > > > > Joseph, > > > > The problem is easy, but not really. <grin> > > > > If you know how quickly the log stops from 200 ft/s to zero and over what > > distance, then the problem is relatively simple. You would be able to > > determine the decleration and multiply that by the mass of the log to get > > your force. > > > > But, the problem is that determining how quickly it stops and over what > > distance is not easy. Thus, the problem becomes difficult. As Michael > > pointed out, it will be come a function of the stiffness of the stop (i.e. > > is it really stiff such that it does not compress much and stops the log > > rather quickly or somewhat soft so that the log takes a little longer to > > stop over a longer distance). > > > > Beyond the above, I am not much help. I could only suggest that you take > > a "reasonable" guess. If you take a guess as to the distance that it > > takes to stop (i.e. how much the stop compresses), you should be able to > > get an approximate decleration value. But, to really be accurate, you are > > talking about dealing with the mechanics and dynamics of non-rigid > > bodies...stuff that make my head hurt (and not because my non-rigid head > > would rather be bounced on the more rigid desk than think of such things). > > > > HTH, > > > > Scott > > Ypsilanti, MI > > > > > > On Tue, 7 Oct 2003, Joseph Grill wrote: > > > > > Gentlemen and ladies of this fine list, > > > > > > > > > I know I am taking you California engineers away from the election this > evening, but I need to ask a question that I am not too familiar with. I > have a situation where a 6200# log is moving along a support driven by > chains. The log will contact a stop mechanism which is supposed to stop the > log. The log will be moving at 200 ft/min. I need to calculate the force > on the stop. Can you give me any help or send me to a reference that I hope > I have that may explain what I need to do. I have been looking at a 25 year > old dynamics book from college, but to be honest it isn't helping me very > much. It is a little late this evening, but I need to get going on it in > the morning. I can scratch out some numbers which I think will be pretty > conservative, but would like some other input if I can get it. The stop > mechanism needs to be designed after the force is determined. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Joseph R. Grill ******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* *** * Read list FAQ at: http://www.seaint.org/list_FAQ.asp * * This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers * Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To * subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to: * * http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp * * Questions to seaint-ad(--nospam--at)seaint.org. Remember, any email you * send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted * without your permission. Make sure you visit our web * site at: http://www.seaint.org ******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ********
- References:
- Re: Contact loads from moving loads
- From: Scott Maxwell
- Re: Contact loads from moving loads
- From: Joseph Grill
- Re: Contact loads from moving loads
- Prev by Subject: RE: Contact loads from moving loads
- Next by Subject: Re: Contact loads from moving loads
- Previous by thread: RE: Contact loads from moving loads
- Next by thread: Re: Contact loads from moving loads
- About this archive
- Messages sorted by: [Subject][Thread][Author][Date]