Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...

Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

Re: k's in LRFD Third Edition

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

This has been addressed on the list recently.  It is basically as Jake
pointed out.  The k values vary from mill to mill.  Thus, AISC has to put
a value in the manual that "works" for all situations.  The decimal k is
for design calculations and will be the "minimum" value of all the values
from the various mills such that it produces the minimum section
properties and thus the "worst" stress and serviceability conditions.  The
fraction value is the "maximum" value and is used for detailing.  It
insures that the worst value for things like clearance issues and other
"buildability" issues is used.


Ypsilanti, MI

BTW, you can likely find the "better" answer from Charlie in the archives
(within the last month or two).

On Fri, 17 Oct 2003, Ken Peoples wrote:

> This is probably a stupid question, but what is the difference in the "k's" that are given for wide flange beams in the LRFD third edition.  If I look at a W24x68, I see a k of 1.09 in one column and 1 1/2 in another.  Is this an error or do they mean different things?
> Thanks in advance,
> Ken
> Kenneth S. Peoples, P. E.
> Lehigh Valley Technical Associates, Inc.
> 1584 Weaversville Road
> Northampton, PA 18067-9039
> Phone: (610) 262-6345
> Fax: (610) 262-8188
> e-mail: kpeoples(--nospam--at)

******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* ***
*   Read list FAQ at:
*   This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers 
*   Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To 
*   subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to:
*   Questions to seaint-ad(--nospam--at) Remember, any email you 
*   send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted 
*   without your permission. Make sure you visit our web 
*   site at: 
******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ********