Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...

Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

# Re: Internal Wind Pressure for Partially Enclosed Bldg.

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
• To: seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org
• Subject: Re: Internal Wind Pressure for Partially Enclosed Bldg.
• From: Padmanabhan Rajendran <rakamaka(--nospam--at)yahoo.com>
• Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 12:56:47 -0800 (PST)

The definitions for enclosed, partially enclosed and open buildings are given in Section 6.2 of ASCE 7-02. According to this Section, the building is partially enclosed when wind is blowing on the open end. The internal pressure coefficient, GCpi, for partially open condition is 0.55 (positive or negative, negative denoting suction on the wall).  Therefore, the wind pressure on the opposite, sheathed 60' wall, will be the sum of leeward pressure and internal pressure. That is, pw=qh*(leeward wall pressure coefficient+0.55). qh is calculated at mean roof height.

Rajendran

richard lewis <rlewistx(--nospam--at)juno.com> wrote:
I am designing a steel framed shed that is 40'x60'. One side is open on
the 60' length. The other 60' wall is sheathed as well as the two 40'
side walls. It is obviously a partially enclosed building. ASCE 7-95
has an internal pressure coefficient of +0.8 and -0.3. A windward wall
coefficient Cp is also 0.8. My question has to do whether these are
additive. If I have wind blowing on the open face it passes through
until it hits the back wall. There it is windward and has a 0.8
coefficient. This means the windward pressure coefficient is 0.8. If I
add an internal pressure coefficient then this must be equal and opposite
in nature and not only presses against the back wall and uplifts the roof
but then blows back out the front of the buildingwhere there is no wall,
therefore negating the windward pressure. So it seems to me the correct
way to do this is to say the inside pressure and the windward pressure
are one in the same. It does put uplift pressure on the underside of the
roof which is additive to the top side uplift, but doesn't add extra
pressure in the horizontal direction.

Am I looking at this correctly?

Thanks.

Rich

________________________________________________________________
The best thing to hit the internet in years - Juno SpeedBand!
Surf the web up to FIVE TIMES FASTER!
Only \$14.95/ month - visit www.juno.com to sign up today!

******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* ***
* Read list FAQ at: http://www.seaint.org/list_FAQ.asp
*
* This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers
* Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To
* subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to:
*
* http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp
*
* Questions to seaint-ad(--nospam--at)seaint.org. Remember, any email you
* send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted
* without your permission. Make sure you visit our web
* site at: http://www.seaint.org
******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ********

Do you Yahoo!?
Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard