Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...

Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

Minimum reinforcement for structural integrity at slab-column connections

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
In the Canadian concrete code, this requirement may be met by one of a
couple of methods.  One of them implies additional reinforcement,
passing over a column or column capital, such that an overlap of 2 ld is
provided with the bottom reinforcement in adjacent spans.

Should the bottom reinforcement in adjacent spans be grouped so as to
touch or be close to the additional reinforcement ?    For example, if
the additional reinforcement is 4 15M bars on each face of the column,
should 4 of the 15M bars of the reonforcement of the adjacent spans be
aligned to pass over the column ?

I have never seen that on drawings.  Everybody in this region at least
(Quebec City) simply adds the extra bars over the column, extending 2 ld
each side.  They leave the adjacent bars at whatever spacing and
position they happen to be at.  Which means that there may be only 2
bars overlapped with the 4 additional bars.  It seems to me that that
would net satisfy the intention to provide post-punching failure

Kevin Below, ing., Ph.D.
660, avenue Royale
Beauport, (Québec) G1E 1Y7
Tél. : (418) 666-0009 poste 272
Fax : (418) 666-0572

Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (
Version: 6.0.555 / Virus Database: 347 - Release Date: 2003-12-23

******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* ***
*   Read list FAQ at:
*   This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers
*   Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To
*   subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to:
*   Questions to seaint-ad(--nospam--at) Remember, any email you
*   send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted
*   without your permission. Make sure you visit our web
*   site at:
******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ********