Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...

Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

RE: Sill plate washer - 2x2 or 3x3?

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
I have seen recommendations for a 5x5 washer for 2x6 walls.  This was to reduce the bending loads in the base plate.

"Haan, Scott M." <HaanSM(--nospam--at)ci.anchorage.ak.us> wrote:
We are about to adopt the 2003 codes. The 2x2 plate washers were hard enough to get adopted and enforced. Is the 3x3 thing an ICC conspiracy to have building departments in Seismic Design Category D fire bombed?

-----Original Message-----
From: Haan, Scott M.
Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2004 11:28 AM
To: seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org
Subject: RE: Sill plate washer - 2x2 or 3x3?


2003 IBC 2305.3.10 only mentions 2x2x3/16 plate washers. I remember seeing larger washers for wider sill plates in the NEHRP Recommended Criteria....

-----Original Message-----
From: Dmitri Wright [mailto:dmitri(--nospam--at)pciengineers.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2004 10:06 AM
To: Seaint
Subject: Sill plate washer - 2x2 or 3x3?


Dear List:

For those who are working in areas adopting the IBC/IRC, here is an issue you may be interested in. It seems rather trivial, but I bet it will cause plenty of bickering between the contractor/inspector/engineer/owner.

The original question:

I noticed in the errata to the IRC 602.11.1 that the sill washers that used to be 2"x2" are now required to be 3"x3". I did not see a similar errata for the IBC 2305.3.10 which calls for a 2"x2" sill washer. Was this the intent of the ICC, and if so, why?

Thank you for clarifying this.

The response:


We are pleased to provide you with the following opinion. It should be noted, however, that the final interpretation is the responsibility of the local building official.



In the IRC, the 2 x 2 x 3/16 washer size was changed by errata to 3 x 3 x ¼ based on code change RB 82-02, submitted by the Building Seismic Safety
Council & dealing strictly with coordinating the IRC provisions with
2000 NEHRP Section 12.5.3. There was no similar code change to the IBC provision, so it remained unchanged and we [ICC staff] have no basis for an
errata to the 2003 IBC on this issue.



Subsequently, the Utah Chapter of ICC submitted code change S83-03/04 which changes the plate washer size to 3 x 3 x ¼ in IBC Sections 2305.3.10
[engineered shear walls] and 2308.12.8 [conventional
construction]. This approved change will appear on the 2004 Supplement to the International Codes available later this month. Supplement provisions do
not automatically affect the application of 2003 IBC, unless they are
incorporated as modifications through local adoption of the code.



Alan






So, it looks like 3x3 is probably the safe bet, but good luck explaining to the contractor who probably bought 5 cases of 2X2's before the steel prices went up.

Dmitri Wright, PE
Progressive Consultants Inc.



******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* ***
* Read list FAQ at: http://www.seaint.org/list_FAQ.asp
*
* This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers
* Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To
* subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to:
*
* http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp
*
* Questions to seaint-ad(--nospam--at)seaint.org. Remember, any email you
* send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted
* without your permission. Make sure you visit our web
* site at: http://www.seaint.org
******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ********

******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* ***
* Read list FAQ at: http://www.seaint.org/list_FAQ.asp
*
* This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers
* Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To
* subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to:
*
* http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp
*
* Questions to seaint-ad(--nospam--at)seaint.org. Remember, any email you
* send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted
* without your permission. Make sure you visit our web
* site at: http://www.seaint.org
******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ********

******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* ***
* Read list FAQ at: http://www.seaint.org/list_FAQ.asp
*
* This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers
* Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To
* subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to:
*
* http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp
*
* Questions to seaint-ad(--nospam--at)seaint.org. Remember, any email you
* send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted
* without your permission. Make sure you visit our web
* site at: http://www.seaint.org
******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ********


Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses.