Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...

Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

RE: Concrete shrinkage (was curing)

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Actually I participate on the ACI 301 committee. ACI 301 primarily relies on
ASTM C33 for coarse aggregate grading, but the Submittals Checklist
( mentions other possible gradations, such as the 8 to 18 percent
method, the 0.45 power chart, and others. These methods can reduce the water
demand (as mentioned by Harold), but aggregates cannot meet these
requirements in all regions. ASTM C33 does not control aggregate gradations
to the extent desired to limit water demand. 

So I am searching for any methods, other than ASTM C33, that are effective
in reducing water in the mix. 

William C. Sherman, PE 
(Bill Sherman) 
CDM, Denver, CO
Phone: 303-298-1311
Fax: 303-293-8236
email: shermanwc(--nospam--at)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bill Polhemus [mailto:bill(--nospam--at)] 

> I'd be surprised if you didn't 
> find the answer to your question somewhere in ACI 301.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sherman, William [mailto:ShermanWC(--nospam--at)]
> Let me re-phrase my question - what specification language do 
> you use to ensure that you get "a uniform gradation on the 
> coarse aggregates"? 

******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* ***
*   Read list FAQ at:
*   This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers 
*   Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To 
*   subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to:
*   Questions to seaint-ad(--nospam--at) Remember, any email you 
*   send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted 
*   without your permission. Make sure you visit our web 
*   site at: 
******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ********