Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...

Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

Re: Antenna towers IBC wind load requirement

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

I can't tell you why the IBC says what it does, but in
my opinion, that ambiguous bit of language should be
applied to uplift or overturning stability only (i.e,.
use 2.0 in lieu of the EIA-222-F factors of 1.5 and
1.25 on the dead weight of soil and concrete, or in
lieu of the EIA-222-F factor of 1.5 for overturning of
a mat).

If you find out from the ICC what the intent really
is...please let us know.

d a v e  e v a n s 

PS: EIA-222-F is an allowable-stress-based standard. 
The next edition, EIA-222-G, is supposed to have load


2000 International Building Code section 3108.4.2
indicates that
"Adequate foundations and anchorages shall be provided
to resist two
times the calculated wind load."  I don't have a
structural IBC
commentary but heard that there is something written
about this.

Is the intent of this section for overturning
stability only?  Should
footings  be designed for [1.7*[2*wind]+1.4*D]*75 or
Should anchor rods be designed for .9*D+1.3*[2*wind]
or .9*D+1.3*D?


Scott M. Haan P.E.
Deputy Building Official

Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 

******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* ***
*   Read list FAQ at:
*   This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers 
*   Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To 
*   subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to:
*   Questions to seaint-ad(--nospam--at) Remember, any email you 
*   send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted 
*   without your permission. Make sure you visit our web 
*   site at: 
******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ********