Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...

# RE: Value for EI in tall wall

• To: seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org
• Subject: RE: Value for EI in tall wall
• From: "Harold Sprague" <spraguehope(--nospam--at)hotmail.com>
• Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2004 19:31:17 +0000

```Joe,

```
I often will either use an upper or lower bound to speed up calculations. In this particular stiffness calculation you are using the EI to determine P critical. The 0.1 will give you the lowest EI and the lowest P critical and thus the most conservative answer. The 0.4 limit is just so the equations don't get you into an area of P critical unsubstantiated by empircal testing.
```
Regards,
Harold Sprague

```
```From: "Joe Grill" <jgrill(--nospam--at)swiaz.com>
To: <seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org>
Subject: RE: Value for EI in tall wall
Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2004 11:49:51 -0700

Harold,
Thanks, I have been able to put that together and you have confirmed that
```
for me. I guess my next question would be is it O.K. to use the upper bound
```value or when is it and when is it not a good idea.

I have once again inherited a project that I have to go through.  It is a
```
custom home that is to be manufactured with "insulating concrete foam walls"
```(ICF walls).  I have a design manual published by PCA with some good
```
information and design examples. They list the Equations that I mentioned in
```my earlier post, but (without explanation) use the upper bound value, where
the example in the Notes on 318-99 uses the lower bound value again without
explanation.  It makes quite a difference in the design of these walls.  I
can't seem to make up my mind as to which and when.

Thanks,
Joe Grill

-----Original Message-----
From: Harold Sprague [mailto:spraguehope(--nospam--at)hotmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2004 10:21 AM
To: seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org
Subject: RE: Value for EI in tall wall

Joe,

0.1 is the lower bound of EI and 0.4 is the upper bound of EI

Regards,
Harold Sprague

>From: "Joe Grill" <jgrill(--nospam--at)swiaz.com>
>To: <seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org>
>Subject: Value for EI in tall wall
>Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 16:25:30 -0700
>
```
>I have a tall concrete wall that will fall in to the range of design by the
```>magnified moment method.  On page 23-2 of the Notes on 318-99 there are
```
>equations for determining EI. I can't decide what's what with that string >of values. The following example shows e/h=1.04 therefore, the portion of
```>the equation with the e/h becomes negative and doesn't satisfy the
>condition.  Because of that they use the equation with the .1 factor to
>determine EI, but when does the equation with the .4 factor come in.  I'm
>confused.
>
>
>
>Thanks
>
>Joe Grill
>
```
```
_________________________________________________________________
```
Is your PC infected? Get a FREE online computer virus scan from McAfee® Security. http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963
```

******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* ***
*   Read list FAQ at: http://www.seaint.org/list_FAQ.asp
```
* * This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers * Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To * subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to:
```*
*   http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp
*
```
* Questions to seaint-ad(--nospam--at)seaint.org. Remember, any email you * send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted * without your permission. Make sure you visit our web * site at: http://www.seaint.org ******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ********