Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...

Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

Re: Masonry mortar

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Michael:

>From "Masonry Design and Detailing for Architects, Engineers and
Contractors" by Christine Beall (third edition):

"Type M is a high-strength mix recommedned for both reinforced and
unreinforced masorny with may be subject to high compressive loads.

Type S mortar produces tensile bond strengths which approach the maximum
obtainable with cement-lime mortar.  It is recommended for structures
subject to normal compressive loads but which require flecural bond
strength for high lateral loads from soil pressures, high winds, or
earthquakes.  Type S should also be used where mortar adhesion is the sole
bonding agent between facing and backing, such as application of
adhesion-type terra cotta veneer.  Because of its excellent durability,
Type S mortar is also recommended for structures at or below grade and in
contact with the soil, such as foundations, retaining walls, pavements,
sewers, and manholes.

Type N is a good general-purpose mortar for use in above-grade masonry.
It is recommeded for exterior masonry veneers and for interior and
exterior loadbearing walls.  This "medimum-strength" mortar represents the
best compromise among compressive strength and flexural strength,
workability, and economy and is, in fact, recommended for most masonry
applications.

Type O is a "high-lime," low-strength mortar.  It is recommended for
interior and exterior non-loading bearing walls and veneers which will not
be subject to freezing in the presence of moisture.  Type O mortar is
often used in one- and two-story residential work and is a favorite of
masons because of its excellent workability and economical cost.

Type K mortar has a very low compressive strength and a correspondingly
low tensile bond strength.  It is seldom used in new construction, and is
recommeded in ASTM C270 only for tuckpointing historic buildings
constructed orginally with lime-sand mortar."

HTH,

Scott
Adrian, MI

On Mon, 11 Oct 2004, Michael L. Hemstad wrote:

> All,
> I've decided to fill yet another annoying gap in my knowledge base.
> What is general practice for specifying different types of mortar (M, S,
> or N)?  Typically, I have specified these based on where they are
> located (exterior, below or above ground; or interior, respectively).
> Does the specified masonry strength play into the choice of mortar, or
> only the end use?  Amrhein's book has some information, but not much
> explanation.
>
> Thanks for any help.
>
> Mike Hemstad
>
> ******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* ***
> *   Read list FAQ at: http://www.seaint.org/list_FAQ.asp
> *
> *   This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers
> *   Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To
> *   subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to:
> *
> *   http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp
> *
> *   Questions to seaint-ad(--nospam--at)seaint.org. Remember, any email you
> *   send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted
> *   without your permission. Make sure you visit our web
> *   site at: http://www.seaint.org
> ******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ********
>
>

******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* ***
*   Read list FAQ at: http://www.seaint.org/list_FAQ.asp
* 
*   This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers 
*   Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To 
*   subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to:
*
*   http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp
*
*   Questions to seaint-ad(--nospam--at)seaint.org. Remember, any email you 
*   send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted 
*   without your permission. Make sure you visit our web 
*   site at: http://www.seaint.org 
******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ********