Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...

Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

Re: Minimum steel in slabs on ground

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Scott,

I've vented to the List about my questions and concerns about the
Anchorage-to-Concrete provisions in AC! 318, Appendix D and its coordination
with other provisions of ACI 318.  I'd like to take your advice and forward
my questions to the appropriate ACI Committee.  How do we do that??

Nels

Nels Roselund
Structural Engineer
South San Gabriel, CA
njineer(--nospam--at)att.net




----- Original Message -----
From: "Scott Maxwell" <smaxwell(--nospam--at)engin.umich.edu>
To: <seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org>
Sent: Saturday, October 16, 2004 1:21 AM
Subject: RE: Minimum steel in slabs on ground


| Bill:
|
| I got no problem with your opinion about 360R.  And I believe that Gail in
| the past has expressed her lukewarm opinion of it in addition to not being
| to impressed with PCA's latested edition of Slabs on Ground.
|
| I have never had a problem with you or others critizing ACI.  I only try
| to express my desire that if you have a problem with an ACI document (or
| some other groups' documents) that you would also inform the group about
| your concern in addition to just expressing it in a forum such as the
| List.  You tend to look at it a lecturing (and maybe it is), but I look at
| it as how will ACI (or others) improve things if you and others don't make
| them aware of your concerns or problems with their documents.
|
| So, by all means, blast away at 360R or other documents.  I just don't
| believe that it will do much good if it only remains on the List.  Of
| course, it may not do much good even if you do raise the concerns with
| ACI.  Just because someone raises a valid point to them does not mean that
| it will necessarily get fixed.
|
| Regards,
|
| Scott
| Adrian, MI
|
|
| On Fri, 15 Oct 2004, Bill Allen, S.E. wrote:
|
| > Michael -
| >
| > I don't think I'm the only one who believes ACI-360R is vague and
ambiguous,
| > particularly when it comes to SOGs used in applications you and I are
| > talking about (no racks, no wheels, etc.). I'm not even (absolutely)
sure
| > (but pretty sure) that it's a good document for determining the
reinforcing
| > in a SOG (I'm now donning my flame suit for Scott and Gail since it
*might*
| > appear that I have obliquely criticized ACI which I am not).
| >
| > Just curious, but have you observed the performance of the 4" (or, gasp,
| > 3.5") slabs you have specified after they've been in place for a while?
| >
| > And I won't comment on a 3.5" SOG with #4s E.W. (on expansive soil, no
| > less).
| >
| > T. William (Bill) Allen, S.E. (CA #2607)
| > ALLEN DESIGNS
| > Consulting Structural Engineers
| > http://www.AllenDesigns.com
| > V (949) 248-8588 . F (949) 209-2509
| >
| >
| > -----Original Message-----
| > From: Michael Bryson [mailto:mbryson(--nospam--at)NYASE.com]
| > Sent: Friday, October 15, 2004 5:27 PM
| > To: seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org
| > Subject: RE: Minimum steel in slabs on ground
| >
| >
| > You are right but:
| > a) in this case it is true
| > b) the building code is only a required minimum, nothing in the building
| > code prevents a designer from being more conservative e.g. applying ACI
318
| > cover requirements for slabs on grade
| >
| > There is probably a number of documents that establish their own
criteria
| > for cover. ACI 360R has a couple of suggestions for example.
| >
| > LA City requires #4@16" with a 3.5" slab but this is only for slabs on
| > expansive soils and compacted fill.
| >
| >
| >
| >
| > ******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* ***
| > *   Read list FAQ at: http://www.seaint.org/list_FAQ.asp
| > *
| > *   This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers
| > *   Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To
| > *   subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to:
| > *
| > *   http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp
| > *
| > *   Questions to seaint-ad(--nospam--at)seaint.org. Remember, any email you
| > *   send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted
| > *   without your permission. Make sure you visit our web
| > *   site at: http://www.seaint.org
| > ******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ********
| >
| >
|
| ******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* ***
| *   Read list FAQ at: http://www.seaint.org/list_FAQ.asp
| *
| *   This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers
| *   Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To
| *   subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to:
| *
| *   http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp
| *
| *   Questions to seaint-ad(--nospam--at)seaint.org. Remember, any email you
| *   send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted
| *   without your permission. Make sure you visit our web
| *   site at: http://www.seaint.org
| ******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ********
|



******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* ***
*   Read list FAQ at: http://www.seaint.org/list_FAQ.asp
* 
*   This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers 
*   Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To 
*   subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to:
*
*   http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp
*
*   Questions to seaint-ad(--nospam--at)seaint.org. Remember, any email you 
*   send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted 
*   without your permission. Make sure you visit our web 
*   site at: http://www.seaint.org 
******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ********