Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...

Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

RE: structural list??

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
I've picked up a little bit---temp shoring, small bridge
accessory stuff resulting from expansion of inspection
and customs facilities at the border on the Can side.

On 28 Oct 2004 at 8:20, Garner, Robert /SD wrote:

> We've picked up some security fencing projects from our local
> government entities.  Special types of fences, security bars over
> doors and windows of communication facilities, that kind of thing.
> Bob G.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Honles, Thomas [mailto:Thomas.Honles(--nospam--at)]
> Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2004 8:23 AM
> To: seaint(--nospam--at)
> Subject: RE: structural list??
> Andrew,
> While you were out, a few of us "went it alone" and unilaterally
> performed a regime change... this is now a water cooler politics list.
> We're surprised you didn't greet us with open arms as liberators!  ;-)
> Here's a structural engineering related question for anyone to chime
> in on, hopefully with as little political spin as possible. How many
> of you on this list have seen direct effects/impact on your
> engineering business or practice from homeland security measures that
> have been undertaken since 9/11? I am thinking these would be things
> like structural changes to building layout, possibly material
> specifications, entirely new facilities and the like. Have you seen
> additional construction activity to support any security enhancements,
> or have you seen projects negatively impacted because of funds being
> reallocated? I hope that gets us back on topic.
> Thomas Honles, SE, PE
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Kester [mailto:akester(--nospam--at)]
> Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2004 6:50 AM
> To: seaint(--nospam--at)
> Subject: structural list??
> I'm sorry, I have seemed to have subscribed to some type of water
> cooler political discussion list. I thought I had subscribed to a
> structural list, my mistake.
> As interesting as these discussions may be ( and you have every right
> to have them), I personally would rather read structural engineers'
> opinions on matters of structural engineering, not politics and
> history. I have an opinion on EVERYTHING, but my mom warned me long
> ago (not that I listened) that "opinions are like a$$holes, everybody
> has one."
> Andrew Kester, PE
> Longwood, FL
> The information contained in the e-Mail, including any accompanying
> documents or attachments, is from Moffatt & Nichol and is intended
> only for the use of the individual or entity named above, and is
> privileged and confidential.  If you are not the intended recipient,
> be aware that any disclosure, dissemination, distribution, copying or
> use of the contents of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you
> received this message in error, please notify us.

******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* ***
*   Read list FAQ at:
*   This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers 
*   Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To 
*   subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to:
*   Questions to seaint-ad(--nospam--at) Remember, any email you 
*   send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted 
*   without your permission. Make sure you visit our web 
*   site at: 
******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ********