Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...
RE: Effect of Volume Factor for Glulam Cantilever[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- To: <seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org>
- Subject: RE: Effect of Volume Factor for Glulam Cantilever
- From: "TED RYAN" <tryan(--nospam--at)pcsainc.com>
- Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2004 18:19:27 -0800
No, you can’t just look at the cantilever portion, like you said, it is between the points of zero moment. The cantilever is not independent of the rest of the beam and neither is the volume factor. Breyer’s wood book has a good example problem dealing with this. It would be conservative to use the full back span length of the beam. Discounting the 21/L portion may result in an unconservative answer.
Does anyone know what is the appropriate length (L) to use when calculating the volume factor for just the cantilever portion of a double cantilevered glulam beam? The AITC Timber Construction Manual states that (L) is the "length of bending member between points of zero moment" so, for example, when adjusting the allowable stresses for a 6'-0" cant. can you discount the 21/L portion of the volume factor?
- Prev by Subject: Effect of Volume Factor for Glulam Cantilever
- Next by Subject: Employee vacation schedules
- Previous by thread: Effect of Volume Factor for Glulam Cantilever
- Next by thread: Merry Christmas