Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...

Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

FW: Compression Capacities for WFs with Webs Not Compact

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

It looks to me like you are using f=36 ksi in equation A-B5-12.  The value
should be the computed elastic stress, which in this case is limited by
column buckling to 7.13 ksi.  At that stress, there is no reduction for be.

I hope that helps.

Curt La Count
Jacobs Engineering
Portland, OR

-----Original Message-----
From: Szuchuan Chang [mailto:szuchuan(--nospam--at)]
Sent: Monday, January 10, 2005 8:28 PM
To: seaint(--nospam--at)
Subject: Compression Capacities for WFs with Webs Not Compact


I am reviewing an existing building with LRFD steel design.  Along the
drag lines of a roof diaphragm are the existing W14x22 beams that
suppose to pass on the collected diaphragm shear to the brace frame at
the end of the building.  I am treating these beams as compression
members just to see if it can take the loads to the brace frame.
(Ignore bending for the moment.)

Fy=36 ksi;
bf/2tf of the W14x22 is 7.46 which meets the flange compactness of 15.9;
h/tw of the W14x22 is 53.3 which is bigger than the compactness of 42.3;
assuming the beam is braced at 15 feet along the weak axis.
Kl/r = 173.1;
Table 3-36 on the manual page 16.1-143 give phi*Fcr = 7.13 ksi.
area = 6.49 sq in
Pall (without reducing for no-compact web) = 7.13*6.49 = 46.3 kips

To account for the reduction on the effectiveness on the web,
I apply the Eq A-B5-12 on pg 16.1-91
(using b=13.7 & t=0.23)
I get "b sub e" = 10.2 inches.   

I than reduce the cross section area form 6.49 - 0.23*(13.7-10.2) =
5.69 sq inches

The new capacity I got is reduced to 40.5 kips.

Question? Am I doing this correctly?



NOTICE - This communication may contain confidential and privileged 
information that is for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any viewing,
copying or distribution of, or reliance on this message by unintended
recipients is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in
error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting
it from your computer.


******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* ***
*   Read list FAQ at:
*   This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers 
*   Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To 
*   subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to:
*   Questions to seaint-ad(--nospam--at) Remember, any email you 
*   send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted 
*   without your permission. Make sure you visit our web 
*   site at: 
******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ********