Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...

Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

Re: Proctor Tests

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Gail,

I remember looking into this a long time ago when we called for modified proctors and received standard proctors from the lab.  As I remember, the standard proctor and the modified proctor are very similar laboratory tests with the standard proctor using more energy (a larger or heavier hammer?).  Both can be used however the desired or accepted percent compaction will be different depending on the test method.  I do not believe there is a direct correlation but if I remember right a 90% standard proctor is roughly about the same as a 95% modified proctor.  With this in mind, I seem to also remember that the standard proctor correlates better with field compaction when using very large rollers whereas the modified proctor correlates better when using smaller rollers, plate compactors, and powder-puffs.  As already suggested, best to check with a real geotech.

Thomas Hunt, S.E.
ABS Consulting



GSKWY(--nospam--at)aol.com

01/26/2005 07:47 PM

Please respond to
<seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org>

To
seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org
cc
Subject
Proctor Tests





Are there are guidelines for when you should specify a standard Proctor and when you should specify a Modified Proctor?
 
Is it  based on type or magnitude of loading?
 
 
Gail Kelley