Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...
RE: IBC Seismic[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- To: seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org
- Subject: RE: IBC Seismic
- From: "Lutz, James" <James.Lutz(--nospam--at)earthtech.com>
- Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 11:32:13 -0800
UBC (section 1630.1.1) required you to include vertical seismic forces, Ev, for USD but let you ignore it for ASD. According to SEAC's Blue Book commentary, that was because "For allowable stress design, these vertical response effects are considered accommodated in the difference between design and actual vertical loads and in special requirements related to reduced dead load..."
I don't know why this was changed for the IBC, but it's been that way since IBC2000, and I don't see any discussion of the change in the commentary.
It seems more logical, particularly in high seismic areas, to consider the loads directly rather than to rely on some stress safety factor, since things may go inelastic on you.
- Prev by Subject: IBC Seismic
- Next by Subject: RE: IBC Seismic
- Previous by thread: RE: IBC Seismic
- Next by thread: RE: Proctor Tests - Why